rjr54

Champion Author
Winnipeg
Posts:1,115 Points:395,370 Joined:Feb 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2009 11:47:43 PM
I just read an article which said that nuclear power plants (here in Canada) give off 0.01% of the radiation that coal fired ones do. It seems that a lot of radio-active material naturally occurs in coal. And that is released when it is burned as fuel.
|
gougedQC

Champion Author
Montreal
Posts:5,140 Points:69,985 Joined:Apr 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2009 9:18:47 PM
oppose-
hugely expensive to build, maintain
relatively short service life..40 years..
massive (and basically unsolved) disposal problems
|
BillA

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:11,175 Points:1,598,660 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2009 11:24:22 PM
Oppose, where do we bury the waste???
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 31, 2009 1:31:22 PM
Favor
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 31, 2009 1:31:15 PM
Favor
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 31, 2009 1:31:09 PM
Favor
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 31, 2009 1:30:54 PM
Favor... nuclear is part of our energy solution.
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 31, 2009 1:30:39 PM
I favor, Nuclear power is the way to go, every state needs at least one nuclear power plant and one more oil refinery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
SUVFan

Champion Author
Columbus
Posts:14,168 Points:1,660,280 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Dec 18, 2008 12:40:23 PM
With prices declining so, I'm sure this idea has faded.
I strongly favor promotion of nuclear fuel. While it may not be the ultimate answer for powering over-the-ground transportation, it's a better answer than gasoline.
Attention to finding safe ways to tap this resource could be a key to economic prosperity by putting people to work here and ultimately selling whatever technology we develop to the rest of the world. Other countries, most notably China, are also working on this problem. China has so many engineers that I'd give them the edge going forward unless our attitude changes dramatically.
|
Z51Corvette

Champion Author
Austin
Posts:8,602 Points:1,696,335 Joined:Jan 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 8, 2008 12:23:28 PM
FAVOR... Nuclear is safe... "Greenies" are not... they will ruin this country.
|
PetSitterPro

Sophomore Author
Houston
Posts:235 Points:9,500 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2008 2:55:36 PM
I am in favor. And I also appreciate a Forum which has a bit of thought behind it, rather than an "x" or "383 beers on the wall" type of post just to gain points.
|
8oneVortec

Rookie Author
Idaho
Posts:5 Points:28,525 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2008 2:45:02 PM
Of course we need more nuclear power plants in the US. I work in the business and it is as safe as the operators who operate the plant. The two most serious accidents in nuclear power happened because of personal error. As long as we continue to train and license operators and monitor their performance, nuclear will continue to be safe. And the waste... well as soon as all the politicians stop playing their games, we can bury the waste in a safe place.
|
gasisoutrageous

Champion Author
Lansing
Posts:8,735 Points:952,600 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Jul 1, 2008 7:40:48 AM
Yes, I favor it
|
Philmar

Sophomore Author
Cleveland
Posts:248 Points:76,475 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Jun 9, 2008 7:17:29 PM
Favor
|
stonewall1988

Rookie Author
Maine
Posts:5 Points:5,150 Joined:Oct 2007
|
Message Posted: May 29, 2008 8:01:24 PM
Lets think about it this way. Its CHEAP, there is a high initial cost, but compared to the amount of power it produces it's dirt cheap. It's very clean compared to coal, oil, or even natural gas. It's safe! 5 mile island suffered a PARTIAL meltdown and released an unknown quantity of radiation into the air, scientists who studied the area estimate that it was no more than having a chest x-ray. Chernobyl is the only exception, but think about it people. Soviet Union, 1986, safety... I don't think so. The Chernobyl reactor was extremely unsafe and outdated even by the standards of that day. I'm all for wind and solar power, but I'm even more for NOT being screwed over by OPEC so I say go nuclear power!!
|
koshV

Veteran Author
Detroit
Posts:480 Points:104,510 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: May 7, 2008 12:56:40 PM
Nuclear power is safe, and doesn't have the environmental problems that other power generation ideas have. we should defiantly use it more.
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2008 11:23:52 PM
Favor
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2008 11:23:46 PM
Favor
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2008 11:23:40 PM
Favor
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2008 11:23:25 PM
Favor... nuclear is part of our energy solution.
|
YB1234

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:7,565 Points:1,739,315 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2008 11:23:04 PM
I favor, Nuclear power is the way to go, every state needs at least one nuclear power plant and one more oil refinery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Blubberpuppy

Champion Author
Baltimore
Posts:18,499 Points:1,929,530 Joined:Dec 2006
|
Message Posted: Mar 15, 2008 9:27:40 AM
For the near future, expansion of nuclear facilities will help in fulfilling our energy needs.
|
Guido4

Champion Author
Pensacola
Posts:13,190 Points:2,699,040 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2008 6:40:15 AM
Favor
|
Quazar911

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:2,070 Points:514,305 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 1, 2008 2:47:51 AM
Unsure
|
nyuknyuk49

Champion Author
Rhode Island
Posts:13,816 Points:2,788,590 Joined:Mar 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 5, 2008 10:51:28 AM
favor
|
Guido4

Champion Author
Pensacola
Posts:13,190 Points:2,699,040 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Jan 5, 2008 10:05:43 AM
Favor
|
april4

Champion Author
Virginia Beach
Posts:12,310 Points:2,427,585 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Dec 21, 2007 11:07:50 AM
favor
|
Dorkchop

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:11,539 Points:1,823,265 Joined:Dec 2006
|
Message Posted: Dec 11, 2007 9:39:09 AM
I favor the government making the licensing process easier for companies to build new plants or add reactors to existing facilities. Until more alternative sources of energy become viable, nuclear will help fill the energy need gap.
|
Quazar911

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:2,070 Points:514,305 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Nov 28, 2007 9:59:40 PM
Unsure but I think oppose-due to safety issues
|
Guido4

Champion Author
Pensacola
Posts:13,190 Points:2,699,040 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Nov 9, 2007 6:44:10 AM
Favor
|
throttle

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:11,982 Points:2,464,695 Joined:Jul 2004
|
Message Posted: Nov 7, 2007 8:28:09 AM
favor
|
tamanite

Champion Author
Los Angeles
Posts:24,097 Points:2,064,250 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Nov 6, 2007 11:40:23 PM
I oppose it because I feel that it will never be safe enough and is just one more way to pass problems on to our heirs.
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Nov 6, 2007 11:01:08 PM
favor
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Nov 2, 2007 6:34:52 PM
favor
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Nov 1, 2007 9:36:26 AM
favor
|
thinkaboutit

Champion Author
Colorado
Posts:1,076 Points:76,225 Joined:Jul 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 28, 2007 12:32:18 AM
unsure
If there was another serious accident anywhere in the world, it is likely that plebiscites would sunset nuclear power (as it has been done before, e.g., Sacramento, CA, Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, Italy), leaving a huge investment stranded.
Also, natural uranium (at today's prices) has a static reach (proven resource divided by current consumption) of less than 50 years. This number CAnnot increase if policies supported a signifiCAnt expansion of nuclear generation. Of course, this limit could be overcome by "breeding" fuel, but who is allowed to "bread" fuel (breeding operations will also always allow production of weapons grade plutonium) -- only NATO countries, Russia, China, Iran, N. Korea?
Finally, nuclear is not the lowest cost method of generating electricity, that myth had been purported by the industry but CAnnot be supported from current financial numbers published (like all industries, cost for disposition and consequences of a potential accident should be included in the price of electricity generated)
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 24, 2007 11:51:15 AM
favor
|
GasXing

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:9,337 Points:1,875,535 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2007 2:05:49 AM
Unsure.
|
april4

Champion Author
Virginia Beach
Posts:12,310 Points:2,427,585 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2007 8:54:54 AM
favor
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2007 5:49:52 AM
favor
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 23, 2007 12:51:13 AM
favor
|
april4

Champion Author
Virginia Beach
Posts:12,310 Points:2,427,585 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 18, 2007 11:41:30 AM
Favor
|
memory_of_max

Champion Author
Little Rock
Posts:7,302 Points:1,057,020 Joined:Mar 2007
|
Message Posted: Sep 18, 2007 2:05:03 AM
favor
|
throttle

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:11,982 Points:2,464,695 Joined:Jul 2004
|
Message Posted: Sep 17, 2007 10:21:55 AM
Favor.
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 17, 2007 1:01:09 AM
favor
|
buddydill

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:9,939 Points:2,457,140 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 13, 2007 4:07:54 PM
favor
|
aj53

Sophomore Author
San Jose
Posts:101 Points:1,265,955 Joined:Feb 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 11, 2007 12:45:05 PM
Obviously they should favor it. It's a lot cheaper, and a lot safer than 30 years ago. Japan who is paranoid about nuclear anything - uses it as a matter of course for much of their power.
|
Guido4

Champion Author
Pensacola
Posts:13,190 Points:2,699,040 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 9, 2007 9:29:08 AM
Favor...
|
FogCitySpotter

Champion Author
San Francisco
Posts:2,615 Points:546,815 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Sep 3, 2007 10:14:34 AM
Favor
|
throttle

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:11,982 Points:2,464,695 Joined:Jul 2004
|
Message Posted: Sep 3, 2007 9:07:17 AM
favor
|